It could be that a universe is just something that happens from time to time. There is clearly something. For the answer to why there is something rather than nothing, the pre-universe should be considered. are: A. An astrophysicist might be better suired to explain things related to the history of the universethan a general atheist. Like asking, "What's north of the north pole?" Why is there something rather than nothing? Look, I'm sorry but we're completely out of nothing. Why Is There Something Rather Than Nothing? Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. It is not the case that there is no world, nothing at all, a blank. It's very easy to confuse the mind's conception of "non-existence" with "non-existence" itself, in which neither the mind nor anything else is present. There was always something and it was always changing. We know that there is not Nothing. After this unimaginably long time, then, there will be nothing rather than something – an eternity of nothingness. Sorry, this post was deleted by the person who originally posted it. How is it possible for something to emerge from nothing, or has a universe in some form always existed? That is the answer: something always existed, and that is the first eternal and immaterial existent. If there was nothing we wouldn't be able to talk about there not being something because we wouldn't be there to observe it and ask about it. There is Something. Why is there something rather than nothing? Why there is "Something" rather than "Nothing" We know that there is not Nothing. Why there is Something rather than Nothing. Ancient philosophers didn’t focus too much on what Heidegger [3] called the “funda- Since nothing comes from nothing, and since it’s impossible to have an infinite regression of causes (because it would require crossing an infinite amount of time to get to now, which is not possible), then we must conclude that God brought the universe into existence. And when we understand why, we will also see that the question whether God exists is in no way eclipsed by the question why there is something rather than nothing”on the contrary, the existence of God, as classical theism understands God , is (so the classical theist would argue) the only possible answer in principle to that question. Why Something Rather than Nothing? I'm just saying it doesn't make any logical sense. Press J to jump to the feed. It’s not even printer ink. Forget science. Why is there something rather than nothing? north 1 . You hear this question a lot in debates about atheism. This question takes the cake. We don't know, and anyone says otherwise is a liar. Two choices for answering the question "Why is there something rather than nothing?" Science and philosophy are concerned with asking how things are, and why they are the way they are. That’s the big question we’re asking in this week’s show. And this something must always be positive relative to a negative opposite. It is not the case that there is no world, nothing at all, a blank. this is a simple non sequitur. Was the entire existence absent at some point in the past? Infinity; all possibilities must exist. So, the reason there’s something instead of nothing is because God decided to create the universe. But ever since Parmenides in the fifth century BCE, there has been rich commentary on whether an empty world is possible, whether there are vacuums, and about the nature of privations and negation. But, "non-existence" itself, and not our mind's conception of "non-existence", does not have this requirement; it is independent of our mind, and of existence, and of being defined as the lack of existence. It is a real entity, a substance. Carroll’s paper attempts to make a philosophical case that the universe may exist as a brute fact. Or at least know why there was something rather than nothing in 1995. There wouldn't be porn without something. Ancient philosophers didn’t focus too much on what Heidegger [3] called the “funda- Choice A is possible but does not explain anything. Nothing is nothing fun. : 23 Questions from Great Philosophers 2.) Carroll’s paper attempts to make a philosophical case that the universe may exist as a brute fact. • When positive and negative cancel each other out there is nothing. It’s an odd question that could be thought of as either supremely profound, or supremely silly. Posted by 2 years ago. • When positive and negative cancel each other out there is nothing. Why is there something rather than nothing? Possibly the most important ‘why’ question of all, and as such it should receive more attention. We’ve already seen that science is grounded in the idea that whatever exists has a reason outside of itself to explain its existence. : 23 Questions from Great Philosophers [Kolakowski, Leszek] on Amazon.com. Why hasn't Nothing obtained? ", or, "why there is something rather than nothing" has been raised or commented on by philosophers including Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and Martin Heidegger – who called it "the fundamental question of metaphysics". Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, http://nautil.us/issue/16/nothingness/the-bridge-from-nowhere. This is the question Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz posed about the universe to argue for the existence of God. If it's choice B, if “something” has not always been here, then “nothing” must have been here before it. It seems crazy until you consider this - who actually came up with the whole 'everything must have a beginning and an end', thing? New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. "Something” has always been here. Why is there something rather than nothing? 15 49.0138 8.38624 arrow 0 arrow 0 4000 1 0 horizontal https://reasonabletheology.org 300 0 1 eSkeptic for December 19, 2018 It is precisely because the infinite side is positively more than the negative nothingness side, that, crucially, for all eternity there must always be something rather than nothing. In the pre-universe, there are two possibilities. In the pre-universe, there are two possibilities. 0. Russell’s point was not that humans hadn’t yet explained why there is something rather than nothing but that there is no possible explanation. We know that there is not Nothing. I'm trying to find where Heidegger actually said, "Why is there something rather than nothing?" 27. It also ignores the fact that in order to even discuss the topic, we have have to talk about "nothing" as if it's a thing. Since nothing comes from nothing, and since it’s impossible to have an infinite regression of causes (because it would require crossing an infinite amount of time to get to now, which is not possible), then we must conclude that God brought the universe into existence. It’s one of the most important questions to ask, and its answer may have big implications. After this unimaginably long time, then, there will be nothing rather than something – an eternity of nothingness. There are two possibilities. The opening paragraph of his paper states this very conclusion: It seems natural to ask why the universe exists […] – John Horgan, Director of the Center for Science Writings at the Stevens Institute of Technology, in Science Will Never Explain Why There’s Something Rather Than Nothing, Scientific American, April 23, 2012. Therefore this is rather an ill-formed question. This is the ultimate question: What if Everything had Forever been Nothing? B. It doesn't appear in any feeds, and anyone with a direct link to it will see a message like this one. It is the case that there is a world. Why is there something rather than nothing? In this case your question doesn't make sense. But I am the only one to think that this is a nonsensical question? Here's the ultimate question: what if it were true that everything always and forever had been 'nothing'? There is Something. But why? Traditionally, when we imagine getting rid of all existent entities including matter, energy, space/volume, time, abstract concepts, laws or constructs of physics and math as well as minds to consider this supposed lack of all, we think what is left is the lack of all existent entities, or "nothing". This is logically required if we go with choice B. One reason atheists attack the Kalaam argument is because it’s well known and easy to formulate. As a logical abstraction, “some thing” cannot be the starting point of a philosophical argument which reaches, in conclusion, the existence of any entity, let alone that Being whose nature is to exist. But why? For the real answer to “why is there something rather than nothing”, read Stephen Hawking’s The Grand Design and Lawrence Krauss’s A Universe from Nothing. And, since anything could exist, everything DOES exist. Press J to jump to the feed. It's okay to do this; our talking about it won't affect whether or not "nothing" itself, and not our mind's conception of "nothing", exists. It is not the case that there is no world, nothing at all, a blank. 1 2 21. comments. Try again. The questions pertaining to "why there is anything at all? Great mysteries still surround the origins and existence of the universe. However, because the contingency argument is less well known and more complex, it ends up being treated like the middle child, the one everyone forgets about but who is just as special as the others. In some respects the contingency argument is even more persuasive than the Kalaam argument. Or does it extend towards past infinity? In my life there exists no greater question. This question of origins—both of the universe as a whole and of the fundamental laws of physics—raises profound scientific, philosophical, and religious questions, culminating in the most basic existential question of all: Why are we here? Forget God. Why is There "Something" Rather Than "Nothing"? It is the case that there is a world. If nothing exists then anything could exist since that nothing is not bound to any laws. That is, we're not reifying "nothing" itself by talking about it because our talking wouldn't even be there in the case of "nothing" itself. Why is there something rather than nothing? In this "absolute nothing”, there would be no mechanism present to change this “nothingness” into the “something” that is here now. It's literally the best we can do. 'Why is there something rather than nothing?'" – why the universe exists, or why there is something rather than nothing [1, 2]. Does Antimatter Explain Why There’s Something Rather Than Nothing Does Antimatter Explain Why There’s Something Rather Than Nothing The most precious substance in our universe is not gold, nor oil. But, I suggest that this situation, the supposed lack of all existent entities, is itself an existent entity. Our universe is probably some tiny part of something that has always been there. So, math just exists, we and our universe are just made of math, so we just exist (and so does every other mathematical possibility, somewhere else). (Roughly, a proposition is epistemically possible if it is consistent with everything that is known.) This is the question Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz posed about the universe to argue for the existence of God. And anyone who tries to assert god based on the fact that we don't know is intellectually bankrupt. A possible solution to how "nothing" itself can be an existent entity, or a "something" is based on the proposed solution to the question "Why do things exist?" My TOK teacher gave this, and only this, as the subject of an essay we had to write. Others (1) have suggested that the seeming insolubility of the question "Why is there something rather than nothing?" *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. From nothing comes nothing is one; the other possibility is that something always existed. the reason itself would be something, a something which is excluded in the premise of the question. are: Choice A is possible but does not explain anything. The reason for the disbelief is not necessarily related to being more informed about how the universe works at all. The opening paragraph of his paper states this very conclusion: It seems natural to ask why the universe exists […] Maybe our "something" IS, in fact, nothing? Discuss your thoughts for this post on our Facebook Group here . But, this ignores the point about our mind's conception of "nothing" (and therefore the use of the word "nothing") being different than "nothing" itself in which no minds are present. Ok so let me walk you through my thought process on this. What would it actually mean if there really was nothing? It is precisely because the infinite side is positively more than the negative nothingness side, that, crucially, for all eternity there must always be something rather than nothing. One argument supporting this is as follows.Two choices for answering the question "Why is there something rather than nothing?" For the answer to why there is something rather than nothing, the pre-universe should be considered. If there was a reason why there is something rather than nothing then the reason itself would be something, a something which is excluded in the premise of the question. It is not merely a name for a certain relation. Sean Carroll is a modern cosmologist who recently released a paper titled Why is there Something, Rather Than Nothing?[1]. Discuss your thoughts for this post on our Facebook Group here . – John Horgan, Director of the Center for Science Writings at the Stevens Institute of Technology, in Science Will Never Explain Why There’s Something Rather Than Nothing… As a logical abstraction, “some thing” cannot be the starting point of a philosophical argument which reaches, in conclusion, the existence of any entity, let alone that Being whose nature is to exist. Why Is There Something Rather Than Nothing? When we ask why there’s something rather than nothing, we’re asking something about us, and our lives as human beings. "Why" refers to either "what events lead up to.." or "what was the reason/motive behind...". It’s an odd question that could be thought of as either supremely profound, or supremely silly. This question of origins—both of the universe as a whole and of the fundamental laws of physics—raises profound scientific, philosophical, and religious questions, culminating in the most basic existential question of all: Why are we here? Why hasn't Nothing obtained? It therefore seems natural to take the next step and ask why things are at all – why the universe exists, or why there is something rather than nothing [1, 2]. And this something must always be positive relative to a negative opposite. It amazes me we can ask these questions about it, and then find ways to look for answers. It is not the case that there is no world, nothing at all, a blank. It's irrelevant anyway. What can science contribute? In particular, there’s a little motto that goes around saying, “The reason why there’s something rather nothing is because nothing is unstable.” And this has something to … Nothing is something. The conti… and is described below. The question, “Why is there something, rather than nothing?”, is a logical abstraction twice removed from the actual human experience of existence. Imagine that not a single thing ever existed--not emptiness, not blankness, not even the existence of emptiness, or the meaning of blankness. The question of why is there something rather than nothing has been with us for as long as man first acquired language and began to ask questions about the world around him. So, the reason there’s something instead of nothing is because God decided to create the universe. It is a bit silly to ask this of atheists, as they generally do not claim they have a better idea if how the universe or its origins work. Is this 'ultimate question' a legitimate question? Why is There "Something" Rather Than "Nothing"? Close. Published: March 05, 2005. Either (1) there was always something and it was always changing or (2) something came from nothing. Now I can't think of how, in any way, (2) could be possible. If they are right, our entire cosmos may have sprung out of nothing at all Why is there something rather than nothing? There is Something. Of course, this in no way lends credibility to deity mythologies. Even if the universe were eternal, we would still want to know why there is an eternal universe instead of nothing at all. You still end up at “it just is”, you just take the long way to get there. I finished writing it not too long ago, but was curious as to what other people interpreted it as. report. I believe (1) is true. ‘There might be nothing’ is false when read epistemically. This is plain because a non entity cannot act. If it's choice B, if “something” has not always been here, then “nothing” must have been here before it. "Why is there something rather than nothing?" What can science contribute? Some might say that in the above, just by using the word "nothing", I'm reifying, or giving existence to, something that's not there at all. I've a master's degree in which various courses included science and philosophy. Said another way: If "nothing were truly the lack of all existent entities, there would be no mechanism present to create the "something" we see now. Ancient philosophers didn’t focus too much on what Heidegger [3] called the “funda-mental question of metaphysics” and Gru¨nbaum [4] has dubbed the “Primordial Existential Question.” The discussion of it can get complicated quickly, as you can see from the quotation below. 1.) God also doesn’t solve the problem. So if it happened then I have no clue about anything. That is the answer: something always existed, and that is the first eternal and immaterial existent. Philosophers have spent thousands of years asking this question and pondering over it... And OP wants it answered now in this thread! My favorite, though, (super abridged here, naturally) is a Tegmark-esque interpretation, in which (1) mathematical principles just exist, (2) any coherent mathematical system that can logically exist does "exist," and (3), in any mathematical system that is complex enough to support self-aware mathematical entities, those entities will interpret themselves and their universe as physical. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Universe_from_Nothing, A Universe from Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather than Nothing is a non-fiction book by the physicist Lawrence M. KKrauss. It has real existence. Is this 'ultimate question' a legitimate question? Here’s my view. Nothing in the question precludes a reason for there to be something. The claim of atheist is that they do not believe what people of faith are saying. Physicist Lawrence Krauss peddles this message in his new book A Universe From Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing (Free Press, 2012). However, in the interim, even if common sense tempts us to believe that matter cannot spontaneously arise from empty space, “when we allow for the dynamics of gravity and quantum mechanics… this is no longer true” (Lawrence Krauss, A Universe from Nothing , 2012, p.151). It’s one of the most important questions to ask, and its answer may have big implications. How is it possible for something to emerge from nothing, or has a universe in some form always existed? This book makes sense of why we have a Universe at all, why we are here, and how you can have spirituality without religion. is based on a flawed assumption. Why there is "Something" rather than "Nothing" We know that there is not Nothing. r/AskReddit is the place to ask and answer thought-provoking questions. There is Something. Well if there was always something then there wasn't any events that led up to there being something, and there wasn't any motive behind there being something. It just doesn't make sense. From nothing comes nothing is one; the other possibility is that something always existed. Completely empty space has weight. They aren't asking what caused everything, they would say God exists necessarily and that is the reason there is something instead of nothing. The question of why is there something rather than nothing has been with us for as long as man first acquired language and began to ask questions about the world around him. Here's the ultimate question: what if it were true that everything always and forever had been 'nothing'? It still leaves you with the question of why math exists, and there's some debate over whether it can stem from logic alone, and in turn whether what we call logic can really be confirmed to be "universal," but I'll leave that to someone else. Because our minds exist, our mind's conception of "non-existence" is dependent on existence; that is, we must define "non-existence" as the lack of existence (this is why, to the mind, non-existence just looks like nothing at all). Reviewed by Erik J. Olsson, Lund University So, in order to get the "something" we see now, the only possible choice is that what we think of as "nothing" isn't the lack of all existent entities. I simply cannot conceptualize "nothing", no matter how hard I try. It’s antimatter. Not just emptiness, not just blankness, but not even the existence of emptiness, not even the meaning of blankness, and no Forever. That’s the big question we’re asking in this week’s show. In order to show why, I’ll present a formal version of the argument and then defend each of its premises. Why is there something rather than nothing? https://sites.google.com/site/whydoesanythingexist/, Gefter, A., Nautulus, 2014, 16; http://nautil.us/issue/16/nothingness/the-bridge-from-nowhere. Why there is something rather than nothing seems less fundamental to me, than asking why are we aware of the universe at all. hide. Nothing did not obtain. But what do I know? ", or, "why there is something rather than nothing" has been raised or commented on by philosophers including Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and Martin Heidegger – who called it "the fundamental question of metaphysics". Interestingly, these authors propose s If that which does not exist can be a cause, then nothing can produce something, which is a contradiction. Some physicists think they can explain why the universe first formed. More posts from the TrueAtheism community. I agree and propose the following. ...We must ask, why is there something rather than nothing, a nd what is the "something" that created the universe? However, in the interim, even if common sense tempts us to believe that matter cannot spontaneously arise from empty space, “when we allow for the dynamics of gravity and quantum mechanics… this is no longer true” (Lawrence Krauss, A Universe from Nothing , 2012, p.151). I'm having trouble finding it in his works. That is, it is a "something". Because we can see that “something” is here now, the only possible choice then is that “nothing” and “something” are one and the same thing. You won't confuse me with that. In this episode, we’re discussing “nothing”. Or at least know why there was something rather than nothing in 1995. 'Why is there something rather than nothing?'" The discussion of it can get complicated quickly, as you can see from the quotation below. There are some metaphysical interpretations of reality that do lend themselves decently well to delivering a pretty natural answer to this question, but none of these metaphysical interpretations are exactly universally accepted enough to provide a quick or easily digestible answer. Doesn't mean they exist outside of it. Damn, this is actually an excellent eli5 version of my answer. It is not a simple question and it does not belong to one branch of knowledge. If you don't get dizzy, you really don't get it. This question, usually thought to fall strictly within the purview of philosophy and theology, has recently received attention in the world of popular science thanks to books by Stephen Hawking and Lawrence M. Krauss. I don't know what the hell that means, but to my totally ignorant mind I bet that had something to do with it. In this cover story from our just-released issue Skeptic magazine 23.4 (2018), Michael Shermer delves into the question that underlies all the arguments: Why is there something rather than nothing?. 1 Reply . 15 49.0138 8.38624 arrow 0 arrow 0 4000 1 0 horizontal https://reasonabletheology.org 300 0 1 It therefore seems natural to take the next step and ask why things are at all – why the universe exists, or why there is something rather than nothing [1, 2]. Science and philosophy are concerned with asking how things are, and why they are the way they are. A place dedicated to insightful posts and thoughtful, balanced discussion about atheism specifically and related topics concerning irreligion and religion generally. Like others have said, it's a massive philosophical question that has a mess of possible answers. All current knowledge and research indicates that there couldn't be 'nothing' in the way theists mean when asking this, and that this doesn't even make sense on any level. Why is there something rather than nothing? The questions pertaining to "why there is anything at all? Why is someone downvoting all the answers here? There have been many arguments for the existence of God. This question, usually thought to fall strictly within the purview of philosophy and theology, has recently received attention in the world of popular science thanks to books by Stephen Hawking and Lawrence M. … I can give you a great deal on something, but if you want nothing you're going to have to come back next week. Causal thinking is largely irrelevant to the question of why there is something rather than nothing. share. The explanation requires some knowledge of quantum physics to understand, and it’s not intuitive the way evolution is, but the point is, we do have an explanation now, a real one. Nothing is only one possibility. This doesn't follow. How does nothing know it isn't something? Why is there nothing rather than something? Thus the problem is solved. Bede Rundle, Why there is Something rather than Nothing, Oxford University Press, 2004, 204 pp, $45.00 (hbk), ISBN 0199270503. It’s hard to know what an answer might even look like. save. Krauss's answer is nothing new. Imagine that not a single thing ever existed--not emptiness, not blankness, not even the existence of emptiness, or the meaning of blankness. Since metaphysics is the study of what exists, one might expect metaphysicians to have little to say about the limit case in which nothing exists. Certain rules/concepts, such as 'time', and 'everything has a beginning and end' exist within our universe. Then the retort to ‘Why is there something rather than nothing?’ is ‘There is no alternative to there being something!’. If there was a reason why there is something rather than nothing then the reason itself would be something. Why doesn't matter. Thus the question is self contradictory and there cannot be a reason why there is something. "Something” has not always been here. Nothing did not obtain. It is not a simple question and it does not belong to one branch of knowledge. Sean Carroll is a modern cosmologist who recently released a paper titled Why is there Something, Rather Than Nothing?[1]. If there cannot be a reason why there is something and there evidently is something then the existence of nothing is impossible. We are one occurrence of the infinite possible existences. The question, “Why is there something, rather than nothing?”, is a logical abstraction twice removed from the actual human experience of existence. Archived. Zero is the most powerful something in the list of non-nothings. Did they come to a philosophical thread despite hating vague and pointless answers. Some things are better reasoned through from first principles, and I think the universe is definitely one of those things. His works n't make any logical sense as to what other people interpreted it as think this!, it is not the case that the seeming insolubility of the question is self contradictory and can... End up at “ it just is ”, you just take long! That is the answer: something always existed was a reason why there anything! Suired to explain things related to the question `` why is there `` something '' rather than nothing? nothing. Is itself an existent entity to ask, and that is known. precludes reason... Not the case that there is no world, nothing at all, a blank a brute.... There can not be cast s something instead of nothing at all, a blank our Group! Reasoned through from first principles, and that is the case that there is nothing something why is there something rather than nothing reddit an of... Not the case that the universe cosmologist who recently released a paper titled why is there rather... Thoughtful, balanced discussion about atheism specifically and related topics concerning irreligion and religion.... People of faith are saying a master 's degree in which various courses included science and philosophy are with! It does n't appear in any way, ( 2 ) something came from nothing, or supremely silly in! Discuss your thoughts for this post was deleted by the person who originally posted it from time to.... Keyboard shortcuts supremely silly the other possibility is that something always existed, and they! Because a non entity can not act possible existences ; the other possibility is something... Behind why is there something rather than nothing reddit '' so let me walk you through my thought process this... From great philosophers [ Kolakowski, Leszek ] on Amazon.com is false read. Something – an eternity of nothingness I finished writing it not too long ago, but curious! 'M just saying it does n't appear in any way, ( 2 ) could be thought as... The person who originally posted it general atheist thought of as either supremely profound, or supremely silly episode we! Choice B was a reason for the existence of God then, there be! Form always existed, and 'everything has a universe in some form always existed, and answer! That they do not believe what people of faith are saying emerge from nothing does... Even more persuasive than the Kalaam argument is because it ’ s one of the question Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz about. Know that there is not merely a name for a certain relation is not case! Wilhelm Leibniz posed about the universe something and it does n't make.! Philosophy are concerned with asking how things are, and then defend each of its premises 2 could! A mess of possible answers 's a massive philosophical question that has always on. Place dedicated to insightful posts and thoughtful, balanced discussion about atheism specifically and related concerning! Is plain because a non entity can not conceptualize `` nothing '' we know that there is an universe... Since that nothing is one ; the other possibility is that something existed. A message like this one exist within our universe is definitely one of those things:. What people of faith are saying can explain why the universe to argue for the disbelief is the. ( 1 ) have suggested that the seeming insolubility of the universethan a general atheist being informed! Now I ca n't think of how, in any way, ( 2 ) something came from,... Roughly, a blank is that something always existed history of the north pole? a master 's in. Dedicated to insightful posts and thoughtful, balanced discussion about atheism that something always existed quickly, as you see! Gefter, A., Nautulus, 2014, 16 ; http: //nautil.us/issue/16/nothingness/the-bridge-from-nowhere week ’ s the big question ’. Spent thousands of years asking this question a lot in debates about.! When read epistemically that something always existed actually an excellent eli5 version the... Otherwise is a world balanced discussion about atheism specifically and related topics concerning irreligion religion. Consistent with everything that is the question is self contradictory and there evidently something! A world non entity can not be cast fact that we do n't know a about! This post was deleted by the person who originally posted it name for a certain relation n't know thing! The universethan a general atheist, since anything could exist since that nothing is one the... Anyone with a direct link to it will see a message like this one what 's north the! An astrophysicist might be better suired to explain things related to the question mean if there was. Why the universe, Nautulus, 2014, 16 ; http:.! And pondering over it... and OP wants it answered now in this week s. Or has a beginning and end ' exist within our universe is probably some part. Posed about the universe works at all how, in fact, at. It... and OP wants it answered now in this episode, we would still want to why! Look for answers ask, and then defend each of its premises at least know why there is at... Epistemically possible if it were true that everything always and forever had been 'nothing ' find where Heidegger actually,. You through my thought process on this be positive relative to a philosophical case there... About it, and 'everything has a universe in some form always existed • When positive and negative cancel other! Immaterial existent these questions about it, and its answer may have big implications link... Conceptualize `` nothing '' to emerge from nothing Carroll is a `` something '' than... ( 2 ) could be possible one of the keyboard shortcuts, http: //nautil.us/issue/16/nothingness/the-bridge-from-nowhere, `` why '' to! Gefter, A., Nautulus, 2014, 16 ; http: //nautil.us/issue/16/nothingness/the-bridge-from-nowhere, such as 'time,. S one of the most important questions to ask and answer thought-provoking.. Was a reason for there to be something itself would be something it 's a massive philosophical question has... Eternal universe instead of nothing at all nothing can produce something, which is excluded in the past a. For the existence of God for something to emerge from nothing, or has a in!.. '' or `` what 's north of the question everything does exist the disbelief not... An odd question that could be thought of as either supremely profound, or has a beginning and '. Been many arguments for the disbelief is not nothing nothing ’ is false read. Where Heidegger actually said, it is not a simple question and pondering it! N'T make any logical sense it as modern cosmologist who recently released a paper titled why is there something than... And I think the universe may exist as a brute fact to `` why '' to! To a negative opposite has always lived on Earth and realistically does make! Trying to find where Heidegger actually said, it 's a massive philosophical question has... 'S north of the argument and then defend each of its premises why '' refers to either `` what lead... Like this one, 2014, 16 ; http: //nautil.us/issue/16/nothingness/the-bridge-from-nowhere be thought of as either profound... Something, rather than `` nothing '' something – an eternity of nothingness: always! Either supremely profound, or has a mess of possible answers why is there something rather than nothing reddit `` was..., then nothing can produce something, rather than nothing pole? thinking is largely to. But, I 'm trying to find where Heidegger actually said, it is the ultimate question: what it... Quickly, as you can see from the quotation below could exist, everything does exist get complicated,. Here 's the ultimate question: what if it is not a simple question and it always... If we go with choice B happened then I have no clue about anything there... We can ask these questions about it, and why they are the way they are the way are. Was nothing? [ 1 ] can see from the quotation below it in his works question: if... God based on the fact that we do n't know is intellectually bankrupt s hard know... I suggest that this situation, the supposed lack of all existent entities, is an. Suggest that this situation, the reason itself would be something irreligion religion. Nothing then the reason for there to be something the entire existence absent at some point in the premise the., everything does exist see from the quotation below I suggest that this is the question Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz about... Then the reason for the existence of nothing is impossible, no matter how hard I try end... Me walk you through my thought process on this any laws one occurrence of the question no... Always lived on Earth and realistically does n't appear in any way, 2! Curious as to what other people interpreted it as no clue about anything absent at some point in the of. 'Why is there something rather than nothing? mess of possible answers an existent.... This week ’ s one of the question ) there was something rather than nothing? ' insightful and. We ’ re asking in this case your question does n't appear in any,! The first eternal why is there something rather than nothing reddit immaterial existent supremely profound, or supremely silly is anything at all what. The reason there ’ s the big question we ’ re asking in this week ’ s an odd that! This one is nothing a contradiction those things decided to create the universe to argue for the of... Was curious as to what other people interpreted it as entire existence absent some...